Shark CryoGlow vs CurrentBody LED Mask: Which Premium Device Should You Buy?

Both of these are expensive LED masks, and both are genuinely well-engineered — but they’re not solving the same problem. Shark CryoGlow pairs red, blue, and infrared LED with built-in under-eye cooling in a rigid, shield-shaped shell. The CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Face Mask: Series 2 skips the cooling and the blue light entirely and instead puts its budget into a flexible silicone fit and a deeper-penetrating near-infrared wavelength. One isn’t a straightforward upgrade of the other — they’re built around different priorities, and which one is “better” really depends on what you’re trying to fix and how you like to use a device day to day.

Quick Comparison

Feature	Shark CryoGlow	CurrentBody Series 2
Approx. price	~$350	~$469
Wavelengths	415nm (blue), 630nm (red), 830nm (infrared)	633nm (red), 830nm (near-infrared), 1072nm (deep near-infrared)
LED configuration	160 tri-wick LEDs (480 light sources)	236 LED bulbs
Treatment time	4–8 minutes, depending on mode	10 minutes
Main treatment modes	Better Aging, Skin Clearing, Skin Sustain, Under-Eye Revive	Single red/NIR/deep-NIR protocol (no separate acne mode)
Blue light	Yes	No
Near-infrared	Yes (830nm)	Yes (830nm)
Deep near-infrared	No	Yes (1072nm)
Under-eye cooling	Yes — InstaChill Peltier cooling pads	No
Mask material/design	Rigid, shield-shaped shell that sits slightly off the skin	Flexible silicone that contours to the face, with nose and chin flaps
Comfort	Heavier (1.5 lbs), more structured fit	Lighter, closer facial contact, cordless controller you can clip to clothing
Best for	Acne-prone skin, under-eye puffiness, users who want a preset “facial” experience	Fine lines, firmness, and users who prioritize fit and mobility during treatment
Warranty/returns	Not clearly published — check SharkNinja’s current policy at purchase	Not clearly published — check CurrentBody’s current policy at purchase

[Check Shark CryoGlow on Amazon] · [Check CurrentBody Series 2 on Amazon]

Shark CryoGlow Overview

Shark CryoGlow is SharkNinja’s first LED skincare device, and it launched as an FDA-cleared, dermatologist-developed mask that combines what the brand calls “iQLED” technology with an under-eye cooling system. Every one of its 160 tri-wick LEDs (480 individual light sources) emits all three wavelengths — blue, red, and infrared — which is meant to keep coverage even across the whole face rather than clustering colors in different zones.

The mask runs four preset modes controlled from a small handheld remote: Better Aging (red + infrared, 6 minutes, aimed at fine lines and firmness), Skin Clearing (blue, infrared, and red, 8 minutes, aimed at acne and redness), Skin Sustain (a shorter multi-light maintenance mode), and Under-Eye Revive, which pairs light therapy with the InstaChill cooling pads. InstaChill uses the Peltier effect and a small fan to actively chill the under-eye area at one of three adjustable intensities, rather than relying on a passive gel insert.

Who it’s for: people who want acne-fighting blue light alongside anti-aging red/infrared, and anyone specifically bothered by under-eye puffiness.

Main advantages: built-in blue light for breakouts, active (not passive) cooling, short session times, dermatologist-developed and FDA-cleared with a 12-week clinical study behind its Better Aging mode.

Main drawbacks: it’s a rigid shell that sits a bit away from the skin rather than hugging it, it’s heavier at 1.5 lbs, and — notably — the cooling pads cover the eye area instead of LEDs, so your under-eyes get the cooling benefit but not direct LED therapy in that zone.

[Check Shark CryoGlow on Amazon]

CurrentBody Series 2 Overview

The CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Face Mask: Series 2 is the second generation of CurrentBody’s original mask, and the headline upgrade over Series 1 is the addition of a 1072nm deep near-infrared wavelength alongside the standard 633nm red and 830nm near-infrared. It uses 236 LED bulbs — nearly double the 132 in Series 1 — and CurrentBody added extra deep-NIR bulbs specifically around the eye and mouth area, where fine lines tend to show up first.

Where Shark leans on a rigid shell, CurrentBody leans on fit: the mask is made from flexible silicone with a nose flap and chin flap, designed to sit close to the skin’s actual contours rather than floating above them. It’s cordless, with a small controller you clip to your clothing so you can move around during the 10-minute session, and it charges over USB-C.

Who it’s for: people focused primarily on anti-aging — fine lines, firmness, and overall skin quality — who’d rather have a closer, more contoured fit than an additional light color.

Main advantages: deep near-infrared wavelength that few competitors offer, close facial fit, cordless and easy to wear while multitasking, meaningfully more LEDs than its predecessor.

Main drawbacks: no blue light, so it isn’t built for active acne the way Shark’s Skin Clearing mode is; it’s also the pricier of the two devices.

Also read 7 Best LED Face Masks for Wrinkles and Anti-Aging in 2026

[Check CurrentBody Series 2 on Amazon]

Technology Comparison

Wavelengths

Shark covers three wavelengths — blue (415nm), red (630nm), and infrared (830nm) — giving it the only blue-light mode of the two. CurrentBody also covers three, but swaps blue for a second, deeper infrared: red (633nm), near-infrared (830nm), and deep near-infrared (1072nm). Independent spectroradiometer testing found Shark’s wavelengths are clinically backed and comparable to those used in professional Dermalux devices, though the reviewer felt some of Shark’s treatment-mode light combinations could be better optimized for their stated purpose.

Irradiance and Treatment Dose

Shark publishes a maximum combined irradiance of 128 mW/cm² at the LED source. CurrentBody doesn’t publish an official irradiance figure for Series 2; independent reviewers have measured figures in the neighborhood of 30 mW/cm² at the skin, though this isn’t an official manufacturer spec and should be treated as an estimate rather than a verified number. Irradiance alone doesn’t tell you how much light dose your skin actually absorbs — treatment time and distance from the skin matter just as much, which is the next section’s whole point.

LED Count

Shark has 160 tri-wick LEDs producing 480 light sources; CurrentBody has 236 LED bulbs. LED count alone does not determine effectiveness. A mask with fewer, well-placed LEDs at the right wavelength, irradiance, and distance from skin can outperform one with more LEDs poorly distributed. What matters more is wavelength selection, dose delivered at the skin (not just at the LED), how evenly light is spread across the face, and — most of all — how consistently you actually use the device.

Treatment Time

Shark’s modes run 4 to 8 minutes depending on which one you pick. CurrentBody runs a flat 10-minute session, recommended 3–5 times a week.

Coverage and Fit

Shark’s shield shape sits roughly 16mm off the skin according to independent bench testing, prioritizing even light spread over a snug fit. CurrentBody’s flexible silicone is built to sit directly against the skin’s contours, with nose and chin flaps that CurrentBody says give the Series 2 about 24% more coverage than the original Series 1.

Blue Light

Only Shark has it. If breakout control is a priority alongside anti-aging, that’s a meaningful point in Shark’s favor.

Near-Infrared / Deep Near-Infrared

Both masks include 830nm near-infrared. CurrentBody goes a step further with 1072nm deep near-infrared, a wavelength that penetrates further into tissue and is less commonly found in home LED masks — Shark doesn’t offer an equivalent third wavelength in this range.

Under-Eye Cooling

Exclusive to Shark. InstaChill uses active Peltier cooling with three intensity levels, aimed at reducing puffiness — but as noted above, it’s a cooling feature layered onto the mask rather than a way to get LED therapy directly under the eyes.

Comfort and Weight

Shark weighs about 1.5 lbs and has a more structured, helmet-like presence; CurrentBody’s flexible silicone construction and cordless controller make it easier to wear while moving around the house.

Ease of Use

Shark’s remote-and-screen setup makes switching between four presets straightforward. CurrentBody keeps things simpler with essentially one protocol and a clip-on controller, which some users find less fussy day to day.

Which Mask Fits Your Skin Concern?

• Fine lines and wrinkles: Both help here; CurrentBody’s deep near-infrared gives it a slight edge for this specific concern.
• Firmness and sagging: Comparable — Shark’s Better Aging mode and CurrentBody’s red/NIR/deep-NIR combination both target this.
• Acne and breakouts: Shark, thanks to its dedicated blue-light Skin Clearing mode. CurrentBody has no blue light.
• Redness: Both may help via red/infrared light’s calming effects, though neither is a treatment for underlying inflammatory skin conditions.
• Uneven tone: Comparable between the two; results depend heavily on consistent use.
• Under-eye puffiness: Shark, due to InstaChill cooling — this isn’t something CurrentBody addresses at all.
• General glow: Comparable with regular use of either device.

Neither mask is universally superior — the right pick comes down to which concerns are actually bothering you.

What Matters More Than LED Count?

As covered above, wavelength accuracy, irradiance delivered at the skin (not just at the LED), treatment time, distance from skin, even coverage, and — above everything — how consistently you use the mask matter more than a raw LED number on a spec sheet. A device you actually use three to five times a week will outperform a “more powerful” one gathering dust in a drawer.

Which Is Easier to Use Consistently?

CurrentBody’s cordless, clip-on controller and flexible fit mean you can walk around, do chores, or work at a desk during its 10-minute session. Shark’s shorter sessions (as brief as 4 minutes) make it easier to slot into a tight routine, but its more structured shell and remote setup make it a slightly more “sit-still” experience.

Which Is Better for Mature Skin?

CurrentBody’s deep near-infrared wavelength is specifically positioned for firmness and fine lines, and the added LED density around the eyes and mouth targets areas that show age first. Shark’s Better Aging mode covers similar ground with red and infrared light and has its own clinical backing, so both are reasonable choices for mature skin — CurrentBody just has one more tool aimed squarely at this concern.

Which Is Better for Acne-Prone Skin?

Shark, without much competition here, because it’s the only one of the two with a blue-light mode. If acne is your primary concern, CurrentBody’s lack of blue light is a real limitation.

Is Shark CryoGlow Worth Paying for the Cooling Feature?

Cooling and de-puffing under the eyes is a nice-to-have rather than a dealbreaker for most buyers, and it won’t replace a dedicated cold-therapy eye tool if that’s already part of your routine. But if you deal with morning puffiness and like the idea of an all-in-one device, it’s a genuine point of differentiation that CurrentBody simply doesn’t offer.

Is CurrentBody Worth Paying More For?

You’re paying roughly $100+ more for a deeper wavelength, a noticeably closer fit, and more LEDs overall. Whether that’s worth it depends on whether anti-aging is your main goal and whether you’d rather have precise fit over cooling or blue light.

Who Should NOT Choose Each Mask?

Skip Shark CryoGlow if: you have no interest in blue light or cooling and would rather have a device that hugs your face closely.

Skip CurrentBody Series 2 if: acne or breakouts are your main concern, or you want a lighter, more budget-conscious premium option.

Value and Price Analysis

Shark CryoGlow sits around $350, and reviewers have called it relatively affordable next to other clinically tested, FDA-cleared LED masks that often run $500–$600. CurrentBody Series 2 runs closer to $469. The price gap buys CurrentBody’s extra wavelength and refined fit — it doesn’t automatically make it the better value for every buyer. If blue light and cooling matter more to you than a third wavelength, Shark is arguably the better value at a lower price point. If deep near-infrared and fit are non-negotiable, CurrentBody’s premium is easier to justify. Pricing on both devices fluctuates with sales, so check current pricing before buying.

Pros and Cons

Shark CryoGlow

Pros:

• Blue light included for acne/breakouts
• Active under-eye cooling (InstaChill)
• Four distinct treatment modes
• Shorter sessions (4–8 minutes)
• FDA-cleared, dermatologist-developed, backed by a 12-week clinical study

Cons:

• Heavier, more rigid shell
• Cooling pads don’t deliver LED light directly to the under-eye area
• Reportedly awkward to store

CurrentBody Series 2

Pros:

• Deep near-infrared (1072nm) wavelength, uncommon at this price point
• Close, contoured silicone fit
• Cordless controller for mobility during treatment
• Nearly double the LED count of its own predecessor

Cons:

• No blue light — not built for active acne
• Higher price point
• Single main treatment protocol rather than multiple presets

Who Should Buy Which?

Choose Shark CryoGlow if:

• Under-eye puffiness is a real concern for you
• You want blue light alongside red/infrared
• You prefer preset treatment modes for different goals
• You don’t mind a more substantial, structured mask

Choose CurrentBody Series 2 if:

• Anti-aging is your primary goal
• You prioritize a close, flexible silicone fit
• You want the added depth of a 1072nm deep-NIR wavelength
• You’re willing to pay more for fit and wavelength range over cooling or blue light

A Realistic Results Timeline

Don’t expect overnight transformation from either device. Most users report subtle changes — slightly smoother texture, a bit more radiance — within the first two to three weeks of consistent use. More noticeable changes in fine lines or firmness typically take 6–8 weeks or longer, and results vary significantly based on skin type, consistency, and the specific concern being treated. Neither device guarantees wrinkle removal, collagen production, or acne clearance — these treatments are proven effective when used properly and regularly, which means consistency matters more than any single spec on the box.

FAQ

Is Shark CryoGlow better than CurrentBody? Neither is objectively “better” — Shark has blue light and cooling; CurrentBody has deep near-infrared and a closer fit. The right choice depends on your main skin concern.

What is the difference between Shark CryoGlow and CurrentBody? Shark is a rigid mask with blue, red, and infrared light plus under-eye cooling. CurrentBody Series 2 is a flexible silicone mask with red, near-infrared, and deep near-infrared light, but no cooling or blue light.

Does Shark CryoGlow have better LED technology? Not necessarily “better” — different. Shark’s tri-wick LEDs emit all three wavelengths from every light source, while CurrentBody uses more total LED bulbs and adds a deeper infrared wavelength Shark doesn’t have.

Does CurrentBody have blue light? No. The Series 2 uses red, near-infrared, and deep near-infrared only. CurrentBody’s newer Multi-Light mask does include blue, green, and yellow light, but it’s a separate, different product.

Is Shark CryoGlow good for acne? It’s the stronger option of the two for acne specifically, since its Skin Clearing mode uses blue light, which CurrentBody Series 2 doesn’t offer.

Is CurrentBody better for wrinkles? It has an edge on paper thanks to its deep near-infrared wavelength, though Shark’s Better Aging mode is also clinically backed for fine lines and firmness.

Does the Shark CryoGlow cooling feature actually help? It’s designed to reduce under-eye puffiness through active Peltier cooling, and users report a soothing effect, but it’s a comfort/de-puffing feature rather than a treatment that replaces LED therapy in that zone.

Which LED mask is more comfortable? It depends on preference: CurrentBody’s flexible silicone sits closer to the face and is lighter to wear, while Shark’s structured shell is heavier but doesn’t touch the skin directly.

How long does it take for LED masks to show results? Subtle changes may appear within a few weeks; more meaningful results in fine lines or firmness generally take 6–8 weeks or more of consistent use with either device.

Are premium LED masks worth the money? For people who’ll use them consistently, dermatologists note that at-home LED devices can deliver real results — but only with consistent, long-term use. If you won’t commit to a regular routine, a cheaper device (or none at all) may be the more practical choice.

Shark CryoGlow vs CurrentBody: Which Should You Buy?

Choose Shark if your priorities are acne control, under-eye puffiness, and a lower price point with multiple preset modes. Choose CurrentBody if your priorities are anti-aging depth, a closer facial fit, and you’re comfortable paying more for a wavelength range built specifically around firmness and fine lines. The core trade-off comes down to this: Shark spreads its budget across cooling and blue light, while CurrentBody puts everything into fit and infrared depth. Neither is a wrong choice — just make sure the one you pick actually matches the skin concern you’re trying to solve.

---

Sources referenced: SharkNinja product support documentation, SharkNinja/Businesswire product launch materials, Tom’s Guide, Who What Wear, Forbes, Geeky Posh, Light Therapy Insiders, and independent spectroradiometer testing by Ben Rawlings. Always verify current pricing, warranty terms, and specifications directly with SharkNinja and CurrentBody before purchase, as these can change.