Omnilux vs CurrentBody vs Shark CryoGlow: Best Premium LED Face Mask Compared

If you’re weighing Omnilux vs CurrentBody vs Shark CryoGlow, you’re probably past the “does LED even work?” stage and into “which one deserves my money?” These are three of the most talked-about premium LED face masks for 2026, and they take three different approaches. Omnilux keeps things simple with red and near-infrared light. CurrentBody adds a rare third anti-aging wavelength. Shark adds blue light and under-eye cooling to a rigid, multi-mode design. None is the universal winner. The right pick depends on your skin goals, how much you value comfort, and how much you want to spend. Here’s how they differ.

• Your brief cut off at “Evidence & Trust – Use manufacturer s…”, so I wrote that section from context.
• CurrentBody has just launched a Series 3, and Series 2 is now the previous generation. I kept Series 2 as the focus, as briefed, and added a short note. You may want to update the title later.
• I couldn’t verify live Amazon prices. I used approximate list prices from recent reviews. Add your affiliate links at the marked spots.
• Shark mode names vary by region. US listings use “Skin Clearing” and “Daily Maintenance”, while Australian listings use “Blemish Repair” and “Skin Sustain”.
• Omnilux warranty terms differ by retailer, so I kept that wording loose.

Mask	Best For	Wavelengths	LEDs	Treatment Time	Approx. Price
Omnilux Contour Face	Simple, focused anti-aging routine	633nm red, 830nm near-infrared	132 LEDs (66 dual-chip bulbs)	10 min	~$395
CurrentBody Skin LED Mask: Series 2	Anti-aging with deep near-infrared	633nm red, 830nm NIR, 1072nm deep NIR	236	10 min	~$470
Shark CryoGlow	Aging + breakouts + under-eye care	~415nm blue, ~630nm red, ~830nm NIR (per Shark)	160 tri-wick LEDs (480 light sources)	4–8 min LED modes; 5–15 min under-eye cooling	~$350

Prices are approximate list prices and change often. Check the current Amazon price before buying.

Omnilux vs CurrentBody vs Shark CryoGlow: Quick Comparison

• Omnilux Contour is the most stripped-back. It has two wavelengths, one 10-minute routine, and no extras.
• CurrentBody Series 2 is the most anti-aging-focused on paper. It has the most LEDs, the only 1072nm channel here, and no blue light.
• Shark CryoGlow is the most versatile and the lowest priced of the three. It’s also the only one with blue light and cooling, and it’s the only rigid mask.

These are different tools for different priorities, not three versions of one product.

What Actually Matters in an LED Mask?

Spec sheets can be misleading, so it helps to know which numbers count.

1. Wavelength. Different wavelengths reach different depths and are studied for different purposes. Red and near-infrared are the ones most associated with anti-aging. Blue is used for blemish-related concerns.

2. Irradiance (power density). This is how much light energy hits each square centimeter of skin, in mW/cm². Higher isn’t automatically better, because the goal is a level suited to skin, not the largest number.

3. Dose. Dose is irradiance multiplied by time. A lower-power mask used for longer can deliver a similar dose to a stronger mask used briefly.

4. Treatment time. Shorter sessions are more convenient, but only if the dose is adequate.

5. Distance from skin. Light weakens as it travels. A mask that sits close to the face delivers more of its output than one held away from it.

6. Coverage. Gaps around the chin, jawline, nose or forehead mean uneven treatment.

7. Fit. A mask you can’t wear comfortably won’t get used.

8. Consistency. This matters most. The best mask on paper delivers little if it sits in a drawer.

This is why LED count alone tells you little. Count depends on how the LEDs are built and arranged. Shark’s own support page explains that its 160 LEDs are tri-wick, so each LED emits all three wavelengths, giving 480 light sources in total. That’s a different way of counting from Omnilux and CurrentBody, so you can’t compare 132, 160 and 236 directly.

Manufacturer figures and independent measurements also aren’t always comparable. Brands may measure at the LED surface, while independent testers measure at wearing distance, and the results can differ a lot.

Omnilux Contour Face: What You Get

Setup. The official product page describes 132 medical-grade LEDs delivering red (633nm) and near-infrared (830nm) light in a flexible, adjustable design used for 10-minute sessions. Retailer specs break this down as 66 red and 66 near-infrared LEDs housed in 66 dual-chip bulbs.

Output and routine. Omnilux states an output of about 30 mW/cm². It recommends 3–5 sessions a week for 4–6 weeks, followed by maintenance as needed. Devices are intended for adults 21 and older.

Focus. This is an anti-aging device aimed at fine lines, firmness and tone, and it’s FDA-cleared for wrinkle-related use. Check the exact indications on the official page.

Limitations. There’s no blue light for breakouts and no cooling. Omnilux devices are final sale and not returnable on the brand’s site, so check Amazon’s return terms before ordering. Warranty terms vary by retailer. One listing shows two years on the mask and one year on the controller, while another shows two years on both.

Who it suits. It suits people who want a straightforward, established anti-aging routine without extra modes to manage.

CurrentBody Series 2: What Makes It Different?

The extra wavelength. Series 2 adds 1072nm deep near-infrared to the usual red and near-infrared. CurrentBody’s page lists 633nm, 830nm and 1072nm LEDs. It has 236 LEDs in total, and one third-party breakdown puts only 16 of them at 1072nm, so the deep near-infrared is a small share of the array.

Output and routine. The listed power density is 30 mW/cm². Sessions are 10 minutes long, used 3–5 times a week.

Fit. It uses flexible silicone. Compared with Series 1, it added more LEDs, a chin strap, a multi-way strap and optional eye inserts, so it’s aimed at better jaw and chin coverage.

Limitations. It’s the most expensive of the three at roughly $470, and it’s anti-aging only, with no blue light or cooling. Its clinical numbers are brand-supplied rather than independent. The 1072nm channel is also newer, and the evidence for it is thinner than for red and 830nm.

A note on Series 3. CurrentBody has now launched Series 3, which adds blue, green and yellow wavelengths, 750 LEDs and personalised dosing. Series 2 remains a capable anti-aging mask, but if you want multi-wavelength features from CurrentBody, look at Series 3 first.

Shark CryoGlow: What Makes It Different?

Light setup. Shark lists blue, red and near-infrared. UK product information puts them at 415nm blue, 630nm red and 830nm infrared. That 630nm red is close to, but not the same as, the 633nm used by Omnilux and CurrentBody.

Modes. The controller has four modes: Better Aging (6 minutes, red and infrared), Skin Clearing (8 minutes, blue, red and infrared), Daily Maintenance (4 minutes) and Under-Eye Revive (cooling only, no LEDs). Sessions with LEDs run 4–8 minutes.

Cooling. The under-eye treatment is adjustable from 5 to 15 minutes, with three chill levels. This is a feature neither Omnilux nor CurrentBody offers.

Design. It’s a rigid shield-shaped mask. Independent designer Ben Rawlings noted it sits about 16mm from the skin when worn. He also found the light distribution across the mask to be even.

Blemishes and puffiness. Blue light is the reason to consider Shark if breakouts are part of the picture. Under-eye cooling may appeal if puffiness bothers you, though cooling is a temporary, cosmetic effect, not a treatment.

Limitations. Shark’s 128 mW/cm² figure is measured at the source of the LED, not at your skin. Independent testers have reported lower readings at wearing distance, and one LED-device designer felt the mode combinations could be better optimized. The mask is also wired to a remote.

Wavelength Comparison: 633nm vs 830nm vs 1072nm vs Blue Light

• 633nm red (630nm on Shark) is a visible wavelength studied for skin texture, fine lines and firmness. All three masks include it.
• 830nm near-infrared is invisible and penetrates deeper than red. All three include it.
• 1072nm deep near-infrared is only on CurrentBody Series 2. It’s positioned as reaching deeper still, but it has less consumer-device research behind it than red and 830nm.
• ~415nm blue light is only on Shark. It’s associated with blemish-prone skin, not wrinkles, and it works differently from the anti-aging wavelengths.

Don’t expect medical outcomes from any of these. Results vary by person, and LED masks are cosmetic devices that work gradually with consistent use.

Fit and Comfort: Flexible Silicone vs Rigid Mask

Omnilux and CurrentBody are both flexible silicone designs that wrap the face. That generally helps them sit close to the cheeks, jaw and chin. Both are cordless in use, with a controller, and both fold up easily, which makes them more portable. Series 2 adds a chin strap and optional eye inserts. Reviewers’ impressions of fit differ by face shape, so check return terms.

Shark holds its shape and sits away from the skin, which some people find more comfortable because nothing presses on the face. Others find a rigid shell less forgiving on narrower or wider faces, and it’s bulkier to store. It’s also wired to a remote.

For all three, check how the mask handles your eye area, since you’ll be wearing eye protection or inserts, and whether the straps stay put during a hands-free session.

Treatment Time and Routine

Omnilux and CurrentBody both use 10-minute sessions, 3–5 times a week. Shark’s LED modes run 4–8 minutes, and you can pick a mode depending on the day.

Shorter isn’t automatically better or worse. Because dose is power multiplied by time, a short session only matches a longer one if the output is high enough at the skin. What matters most is which routine you’ll actually keep up. A 6-minute session you do consistently beats a 10-minute one you skip.

Which One Is Best for Your Skin Goal?

If your priority is wrinkles and fine lines. Omnilux and CurrentBody both focus on this. Shark’s Better Aging mode also targets it with red and near-infrared.

If your priority is firmness. The same masks apply. Firming benefits build slowly, so plan on weeks of consistent use.

If you want deep near-infrared. CurrentBody Series 2 is the only one of these three with 1072nm.

If you also struggle with breakouts. Shark is the only one with blue light.

If under-eye puffiness matters. Shark is the only one with dedicated under-eye cooling.

If comfort is your priority. Try the flexible masks, Omnilux or CurrentBody, if you dislike rigid shells. If you dislike pressure on your face, Shark’s stand-off design may suit you better.

If you want the simplest routine. Omnilux has one routine and no modes to choose from.

If you want the most feature-rich experience. Shark has the most modes at the lowest price, though its output at the skin is less transparent. CurrentBody Series 3 is the most feature-rich of the three brands, but it’s a newer, pricier product.

Are These Premium LED Masks Worth the Price?

Roughly, Shark costs about $350, Omnilux about $395 and CurrentBody Series 2 about $470. Amazon prices and promotions change, so check before you buy.

With Omnilux, you’re paying for a focused two-wavelength setup, a flexible design and an established LED platform.

With CurrentBody, you’re paying for the 1072nm wavelength, the higher LED count, the flexible design and premium positioning. Whether that’s worth around $75 more than Omnilux depends on how much you value the extra wavelength, which has less independent evidence behind it.

With Shark, you’re paying for a multi-mode system, blue light, cooling and rigid construction, at the lowest price of the three.

For most people the deciding factor isn’t price, it’s use. A mask that gets used three to five times a week is good value at any of these prices.

Pros and Cons

Omnilux Contour Face

Pros

• Focused red and near-infrared setup with a simple 10-minute routine
• Flexible design and a well-established platform
• FDA-cleared for wrinkle-related use

Cons

• No blue light or cooling
• Final sale on the brand’s site; check Amazon’s return policy
• Fewer LEDs and no extra wavelength versus CurrentBody

CurrentBody Series 2

Pros

• Only mask here with 1072nm deep near-infrared
• 236 LEDs and flexible silicone with chin coverage
• 10-minute sessions with a straightforward routine

Cons

• Highest price of the three, around $470
• Anti-aging only, with no blue light or cooling
• Now the previous generation, since Series 3 has launched
• Clinical results are brand-supplied

Shark CryoGlow

Pros

• Only mask with blue light and under-eye cooling
• Four modes and shorter LED sessions
• Lowest price of the three

Cons

• Rigid, and sits away from the skin
• Headline irradiance is measured at the LED, and independent measurements are lower
• Wired remote, and the mode combinations aren’t universally praised

Buying Decision Framework

This is a decision aid, not a ranking.

If you care most about…	Consider
Simple anti-aging LED routine	Omnilux Contour
1072nm deep NIR	CurrentBody Series 2
Blue light + cooling	Shark CryoGlow
Flexible silicone comfort	Omnilux / CurrentBody
Under-eye cooling	Shark CryoGlow
Minimalist anti-aging setup	Omnilux
More advanced wavelength setup	CurrentBody

Evidence & Trust

This comparison is based on manufacturer information, retailer listings and published third-party reviews. Petal Beauty has not personally tested these masks.

Keep three things in mind. First, brand-supplied clinical results usually come from the brand’s own studies, so treat them as marketing evidence, not independent proof. Second, specs like irradiance depend on how and where they’re measured, so a bigger number isn’t automatically better. Third, individual results vary, and LED masks are cosmetic devices, not medical treatments.

Read the contraindications before use. If you have a light-sensitive condition, take medications that increase light sensitivity, are pregnant, or have any skin concern you’re unsure about, check with a dermatologist first. Follow each manufacturer’s guidance on eye protection and session frequency.

Final Verdict: Which Premium LED Face Mask Should You Buy?

In the Omnilux vs CurrentBody vs Shark CryoGlow decision, the best premium LED face mask is the one that fits your goals and your routine. Choose Omnilux for a simple, focused anti-aging setup. Choose CurrentBody Series 2 if the extra 1072nm wavelength and flexible fit matter to you, and look at Series 3 if you want the newest CurrentBody features. Choose Shark CryoGlow if breakouts or under-eye puffiness are part of the picture and you don’t mind a rigid design. Whichever you pick, consistent use matters more than any single spec.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Petal Beauty Skincare may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. This article is for general information and isn’t medical advice.

---